I prefer proteins, but I occasionally dabble with DNA as all biologists need to do from time to time. On this SE I noticed that there are tags for rna, dna, and mrna.
Inspired by an inconclusive tagging enzymes as proteins meta question, I'm wondering if it would be much more efficient to just use the nucleic acid tag rather than these specific tags? I guess I am asking people working in DNA or RNA, are there situations where the other nucleic acid is a completely different kettle of fish?
Example
This came up specifically after I noticed this question which requires specific expertise on RNA and DNA, but also generally would use the nucleic acid tag. That's three tags for as far as I can see could all be under one supertag since now there is no room for a biochemistry tag for example.
[rna]
and[mrna]
, but whatever works for people... $\endgroup$[dna]
and[rna]
, as[nucleic-acids]
is fine. I added[biochemistry]
, too. $\endgroup$