1
$\begingroup$

A user has just made the tags and for non-coding RNA and long-non-coding RNA respectively. Are these tags worth having? The abbreviations are obscure and not likely to be tried/used by users posting relevant questions. Also there is already a and I think this would suffice for both and .

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Unless we get significantly more questions about the various kinds of non-coding RNA, I don't think we need more than the tag for now.

The abbreviations also don't work well as tags because they become all lowercase, and ncrna is harder to read than ncRNA.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ agreed that they are hard to read $\endgroup$ – rg255 May 31 '16 at 8:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .