0
$\begingroup$

The tag seems a bit redundant to me, as everthing on this site is about biology.

I propose to rename it to just , to bring it in line with all the other tags on the site. Please post your counter-arguments here if you disagree.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I like your proposal, and I would go one step further. Currently there are 5 tags for humans:

  • human-genetics
  • human-genome
  • human-anatomy
  • human-ear
  • human-biology

I propose that we merge genetics/genome to "human-genetics"; anatomy, ear and biology to "human-physiology" to make the tag more descriptive.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I think this is a better proposal than just a blanket "humans" $\endgroup$
    – John Smith
    Jan 2 '13 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks John. You can upvote my answer too. =) $\endgroup$
    – user560
    Jan 2 '13 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ I think human biology itself is an unnecessary tag.. most of our research is already anthropocentric.. for example genetics is genetics.. what is special about human genetics.. it sounds like a journal name.. $\endgroup$
    – WYSIWYG
    Apr 15 '13 at 11:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .