Timeline for Should questions without definitive answers be closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://biology.stackexchange.com/ with https://biology.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 6, 2013 at 6:04 | comment | added | shigeta | IMHO biology is changing too rapidly to confine ourselves to established results. The site does not have enough traffic and closing down questions because it doesn't feel like stackoverflow has never seemed constructive to me. I would like recent advances in biology to be discussed here for instance. | |
| Apr 5, 2012 at 17:48 | comment | added | CHM | I think your question was very pertinent. | |
| Dec 18, 2011 at 21:11 | answer | added | Mad Scientist | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 18, 2011 at 11:02 | comment | added | Cody Gray | These may not have a definite answer, but they're expert-level questions that definitely benefit from high-quality insider information. They're not the "bad" subjective questions that we try so hard to discourage on SE sites. | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 6:29 | comment | added | nico | I don't think that question should be closed, it should be CW, though. | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 2:54 | answer | added | jonsca | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 2:16 | answer | added | Nick T | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 1:05 | answer | added | yamad | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 0:27 | comment | added | Nick T | My comment wasn't the best; the main issue is that it's subjective and something of a recommendation request. Answers to the questions you linked would have hard facts behind them | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 0:18 | history | edited | kmm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add some examples.
|
| Dec 16, 2011 at 0:04 | history | asked | kmm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |