Timeline for How to link to scientific articles on Biology.SE
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 28, 2012 at 15:28 | history | edited | Abe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 442 characters in body
|
Jun 28, 2012 at 15:25 | comment | added | Abe | @bonthejoe The pmid or doi can also be added to the reference. I will adjust the answer. I agree that doi is the 'standard', and i use it in my own database because it reduces error in automated queried (within my database that doesn't have fuzzy matching) but for many without institutional access this is more useful. And having author, year, title, and journal is just as capable of uniquely identifying an article as a doi. | |
Jun 28, 2012 at 9:08 | comment | added | bobthejoe | While certainly convenient, I feel that pdfs are dynamic and may drift. I'm personally much more comfortable linking a pmid or the doi. | |
Jun 26, 2012 at 18:21 | history | edited | Rik Smith-Unna | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed accidental repeat
|
Jun 19, 2012 at 4:56 | history | answered | Abe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |