Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackBiology/status/837569803254710272
added 1 character in body
Source Link
WYSIWYG Mod
  • 35.6k
  • 15
  • 29

Recently, I have been observing that moderation by community is not happening adequately and hence the review queue becomes quite long. Sometimes I have seen close to 80 items in the review queue (most of them are for closure).

Under these circumstances, the burden on the moderators and the active users increases a lot which may sometimes lead to misjudgment.

We have a total of 12087 users, out of which only 57 have the privilege to cast a close/reopen vote. This is still not bad; if each of those 57 people users actively participate then, then under the usual circumstances there will be hardly more than two reviews per user.

I therefore appeal to our community members to actively participate in the review process. The quality of the site depends on you.

If there is some problem that I am unaware of, then please let me know.

Recently I have been observing that moderation by community is not happening adequately and hence the review queue becomes quite long. Sometimes I have seen close to 80 items in the review queue (most of them are for closure).

Under these circumstances, the burden on the moderators and the active users increases a lot which may sometimes lead to misjudgment.

We have a total of 12087, out of which only 57 have the privilege to cast a close/reopen vote. This is still not bad; if each of those 57 people users actively participate then, under the usual circumstances there will be hardly more than two reviews per user.

I therefore appeal to our community members to actively participate in the review process. The quality of the site depends on you.

If there is some problem that I am unaware of, then please let me know.

Recently, I have been observing that moderation by community is not happening adequately and hence the review queue becomes quite long. Sometimes I have seen close to 80 items in the review queue (most of them are for closure).

Under these circumstances, the burden on the moderators and the active users increases a lot which may sometimes lead to misjudgment.

We have a total of 12087 users, out of which only 57 have the privilege to cast a close/reopen vote. This is still not bad; if each of those 57 users actively participate, then under the usual circumstances there will be hardly more than two reviews per user.

I therefore appeal to our community members to actively participate in the review process. The quality of the site depends on you.

If there is some problem that I am unaware of, then please let me know.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
WYSIWYG Mod
  • 35.6k
  • 15
  • 29

Recently I have been observing that moderation by community is not happening adequately and hence the review queue becomes quite long. Sometimes I have seen close to 80 items in the review queue (most of them are for closure).

Under these circumstances, the burden on the moderators and the active users increases a lot which may sometimes lead to misjudgment.

We have a total of 12087, out of which only 57 have the privilege to cast a close/reopen vote. This is still not bad; if each of those 57 people users actively participate then, under the usual circumstances there will be hardly more than two reviews per user.

I therefore appeal to our community members to actively participate in the review process. The quality of the site depends on you.

If there is some problem that I am unaware of, then please let me know.

Recently I have been observing that moderation by community is not happening adequately and hence the review queue becomes quite long. Sometimes I have seen close to 80 items in the review queue (most of them are for closure).

Under these circumstances, the burden on the moderators and the active users increases a lot which may sometimes lead to misjudgment.

We have a total of 12087, out of which only 57 have the privilege to cast a close/reopen vote. This is still not bad; if each of those 57 people users actively participate then, under the usual circumstances there will be hardly more than two reviews per user.

I therefore appeal to our community members to actively participate in the review process. The quality of the site depends on you.

If there is some problem that I am unaware of then please let me know.

Recently I have been observing that moderation by community is not happening adequately and hence the review queue becomes quite long. Sometimes I have seen close to 80 items in the review queue (most of them are for closure).

Under these circumstances, the burden on the moderators and the active users increases a lot which may sometimes lead to misjudgment.

We have a total of 12087, out of which only 57 have the privilege to cast a close/reopen vote. This is still not bad; if each of those 57 people users actively participate then, under the usual circumstances there will be hardly more than two reviews per user.

I therefore appeal to our community members to actively participate in the review process. The quality of the site depends on you.

If there is some problem that I am unaware of, then please let me know.

Source Link
WYSIWYG Mod
  • 35.6k
  • 15
  • 29

Inadequate moderation by the community

Recently I have been observing that moderation by community is not happening adequately and hence the review queue becomes quite long. Sometimes I have seen close to 80 items in the review queue (most of them are for closure).

Under these circumstances, the burden on the moderators and the active users increases a lot which may sometimes lead to misjudgment.

We have a total of 12087, out of which only 57 have the privilege to cast a close/reopen vote. This is still not bad; if each of those 57 people users actively participate then, under the usual circumstances there will be hardly more than two reviews per user.

I therefore appeal to our community members to actively participate in the review process. The quality of the site depends on you.

If there is some problem that I am unaware of then please let me know.